Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago

United States Supreme Court
440 U.S. 490 (1979)


Facts

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant) exercised jurisdiction over lay faculty members at two groups of religious high schools owned by the Catholic Bishop of Chicago and the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc. (plaintiffs). The NLRB certified certain unions as the bargaining agents for these teachers and ordered the schools to bargain with those unions. Additionally, charges of unfair labor practices were filed against the schools under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-69. At a hearing before the NLRB, the schools argued that the challenged practices were mandated by the schools’ religious creeds and that the NLRB could not exercise jurisdiction over church-operated schools. The NLRB disagreed and ordered the schools to cease the challenged practices and enter into collective-bargaining agreements with the unions. The schools challenged the NLRB’s order in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The court of appeals held in favor of the schools and declined to enforce the order. The NLRB petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.