National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 405 (1964)
The Boilermakers Union advised Exchange Parts Co. (defendant) that a majority of its employees had supported union representation and petitioned the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (plaintiff) for an election. Two weeks before the election, the company sent its employees a letter detailing the benefits the company had provided for over a decade, stating, “The Union can’t put any of those things in your envelope—only the Company can do that. . . . [I]t didn’t take a Union to get any of those things and . . . it won’t take a Union to get additional improvements in the future.” The company included a statement of benefits with a new overtime policy that increased wages during holiday weeks and a better vacation schedule. The union lost the election, but the NLRB found that the letter violated the employees’ right to organize without employer interference under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The circuit court of appeals reversed, reasoning that the benefits the company offered were permanent and unconditional even though intended to affect the election outcome. The union appealed to the Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.