National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International Union

361 U.S. 477 (1960)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents’ International Union

United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 477 (1960)

Play video

Facts

Since 1949, the Insurance Agents’ International Union (defendant) represented Prudential insurance agents. While negotiating a new collective-bargaining agreement for 1956, the union warned that it would organize a “Work without a Contract” program intended to harass Prudential unless the parties reached agreement before the existing contract expired. Agents who were union members refused to solicit new business or perform usual duties. Instead, agents engaged in sit-ins, picketing, and leafleting at the Prudential home office and presented petitions that policyholders had signed. Prudential filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (plaintiff), asserting that the union failed to negotiate, even though the union bargained in good faith and agreed to a new contract in the interim. The hearing examiner found the economically harassing activities alone did not violate § 8(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), but the NLRB concluded that economically harassing tactics demonstrated a lack of good-faith bargaining as a matter of law, even though the union meanwhile continued negotiations. After the appellate court reversed, the Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 733,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership