National Labor Relations Board v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212

364 U.S. 573 (1961)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Labor Relations Board v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212

United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 573 (1961)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Columbia Broadcasting Systems employed television technicians and stage workers who fought over the lighting work for television shows. The Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 212 (defendant), represented the technicians, but stage workers belonged to another union. Both unions had bargaining-agent certifications for their respective workers and collective-bargaining agreements (CBAs) with Columbia, but none of the contracts clearly apportioned the lighting work. For years the parties quarreled over remote lighting for telecasts broadcast away from Columbia’s home studio. Each union called strikes when Columbia assigned lighting work to the other’s members. When Columbia assigned remote-lighting work for a major telecast from New York’s Waldorf-Astoria Hotel to stage employees, television technicians refused to operate the cameras, forcing Columbia to cancel the show. Columbia filed unfair-labor-practice charges against the technicians’ union. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held a hearing and found the technicians’ union did not have rights to the work under any outstanding NLRB order, certification, or CBA, but did not consider other criteria like Columbia’s past practices or industry custom and failed to affirmatively allocate the work. The technicians’ union refused to comply, arguing the NLRB had to make a final, binding determination using the same factors as in arbitration proceedings. The NLRB ordered the technicians’ union to stop striking, but the Second Circuit agreed that the NLRB had failed to make the required determination and refused to enforce the order. The Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership