National Maritime Safety Association v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
649 F.3d 743 (2011)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (defendant) published a final rule regulating a method of hoisting known as a vertical tandem lift (VTL). The National Maritime Safety Association (NMSA) (plaintiff), a trade association representing marine-terminal operators, petitioned for review of the rule. A VTL used a crane to lift multiple interconnected shipping containers at once. At the time the rule was promulgated, marine cargo handlers had been performing VTLs for more than 20 years. OSHA estimated that one million VTLs had been performed since 1986. No injuries had been reported as having occurred during a VTL. The final rule limited the weight of two-container VTLs and banned VTLs of certain types of containers. The rule also required that certain equipment be inspected immediately prior to being used in a VTL despite OSHA’s acknowledgement that this might make ship-to-shore VTLs impractical. The NMSA argued that OSHA had failed to demonstrate that VTLs posed a significant risk to worker safety. Specifically, the NMSA challenged OSHA’s finding of significant risk on two grounds: (1) that OSHA was required to, but did not, quantify the risk that VTLs posed to worker safety; and (2) that OSHA relied on a finding that unregulated VTL operations posed a significant risk to worker safety without considering existing voluntary standards and current industry practice.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Henderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.