Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • N
  • National Parks and Conservation Association …National Parks and Conservation Association v. Stanton
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

National Parks and Conservation Association v. Stanton

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
54 F.Supp.2d 7 (1999)


The Niobrara National Scenic River (river) ran largely through private land in Nebraska. Over local opposition, Congress designated portions of the river as components of the Wild and Scenic Rivers system. Congress created the Niobrara Scenic River Advisory Commission (Commission) to represent local interests in the development of a management plan for the river area. The National Park Service (NPS) (defendant) and the Commission developed a General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/EIS), which included four alternatives for river administration. The NPS selected Alternative B, which authorized management by a local council. The NPS then entered into an interlocal agreement with local government entities to establish the Niobrara Council (Council), which was composed of 15 members representing primarily local commercial and landowning interests. The Council included one NPS representative, and decisions were made by a majority vote. The interlocal agreement encouraged the Council to seek outside funding sources in order to prevent the NPS from controlling the Council’s decisions. A cooperative agreement between the Council and the NPS allowed the NPS to terminate the agreement and implement another river-management alternative if the Council failed to manage the river as specified in the GMP/EIS. The National Parks and Conservation Association and others (plaintiffs) sued NPS Director Robert Stanton and the secretary of the interior (defendants), claiming that the adoption of Alternative B involved an unlawful delegation of responsibility. The plaintiffs sought an injunction requiring the NPS to manage the river and to complete a more thorough EIS. Both parties moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Kessler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial