National Presto Industries, Inc. v. United States

338 F.2d 99 (1964)

From our private database of 47,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Presto Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims
338 F.2d 99 (1964)

Rich Walter headshot
  • Written by Rich Walter, JD

Facts

National Presto Industries, Inc. (Presto) (plaintiff) contracted with the United States government (defendant) to make improved artillery shells for the Army. The government required Presto to make the shells using an experimental new production method. The contract contained no risk-allocation clause. Presto suspected that the new process might require expensive new grinders, which it did not have on hand. However, a short test phase did not reveal the need for such costly equipment. Once the test phase had ended, it was too late to raise the contract’s fixed per-unit price. As production progressed, Presto realized that the new grinders were essential. Presto bought the equipment and then petitioned the federal Court of Claims for reimbursement. The court submitted the case to a commissioner, whose findings as to the cost of reimbursement were ambiguous.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

Dissent (Whitaker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 949,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 949,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,400+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,004 law school casebooks.

Case book preview