National Presto Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
338 F.2d 99 (1964)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
National Presto Industries, Inc. (Presto) (plaintiff) contracted with the United States government (defendant) to make improved artillery shells for the Army. The government required Presto to make the shells using an experimental new production method. The contract contained no risk-allocation clause. Presto suspected that the new process might require expensive new grinders, which it did not have on hand. However, a short test phase did not reveal the need for such costly equipment. Once the test phase had ended, it was too late to raise the contract’s fixed per-unit price. As production progressed, Presto realized that the new grinders were essential. Presto bought the equipment and then petitioned the federal Court of Claims for reimbursement. The court submitted the case to a commissioner, whose findings as to the cost of reimbursement were ambiguous.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)
Dissent (Whitaker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
