National State Bank of Elizabeth, N.J. v. Smith

591 F.2d 223 (1979)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National State Bank of Elizabeth, N.J. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
591 F.2d 223 (1979)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Under the National Bank Act, the United States Comptroller of the Currency (the comptroller) (defendant) had the authority to approve the organization of national bank associations. City Federal Savings and Loan Association (City Federal SL) (defendant) was a savings-and-loan association. City Consumer Services, Inc. (City Consumer) (defendant) was City Federal SL’s wholly owned subsidiary. City Trust Services, N.A. (City Trust) was planned to be a wholly owned subsidiary of City Consumer. City Federal SL requested authority from the comptroller for permission to organize City Trust as a national banking association without the authority to receive deposits and make loans. Essentially, City Federal SL sought to operate City Trust as City Federal SL’s own trust department. National State Bank of Elizabeth, N.J. (National State Bank) (plaintiff) and 11 other banks objected to City Federal SL’s application. Regardless, the comptroller granted preliminary approval of City Federal SL’s application to organize City Trust as a national bank with limited powers. National State Bank sued the comptroller, City Federal SL, and City Consumer, among others, alleging, in part, that the comptroller’s approval violated the National Bank Act. The district court declared that the comptroller’s approval of the organization of City Trust was invalid and ordered the comptroller to revoke City Trust’s certificate of authority. The comptroller, City Federal SL, and City Consumer appealed. The appeal was presented to the court of appeals on October 18, 1978. On November 10, 1978, Congress enacted an amendment to the National Bank Act that expressly authorized the comptroller to issue certificates of authority to national bank associations whose operations were limited to those of a trust company. The amendment applied retroactively to the present case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Maris, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership