Nationwide Cellular Service v. American Mobile Communications

1991 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. ¶ 96,435 (1991)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nationwide Cellular Service v. American Mobile Communications

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1991 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. ¶ 96,435 (1991)

RW

Facts

Nationwide Cellular Service, Inc. (Nationwide) (plaintiff) agreed to transfer shares of its stock to American Mobile Communications, Inc. (American) (defendant) in exchange for American’s assets. After finalizing this transaction, Nationwide learned that American had significantly overstated the value of its assets. Nationwide sued American in federal district court for having violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Nationwide alleged that it agreed to the transaction in reliance on American’s financial statements and warranties as to the accuracy of those statements and suffered injury as a result of that reliance. Nationwide also alleged that American either knew its statements and warranties to be false or acted in reckless disregard of the truth. American moved to dismiss the suit. American argued that its alleged misstatements involved only the value of its assets, not the value of the securities Nationwide exchanged to acquire those assets, and that, therefore, Nationwide failed to comply with the pleading requirements of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership