Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Black
Ohio Court of Appeals
102 Ohio App. 3d 235, 656 N.E.2d 1352 (1995)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Kay Black and William Black (passengers), Ohio residents, were passengers in a car owned and driven by Ruby Black (driver) (defendant), also an Ohio resident. In Ontario, Canada, the driver’s car collided with a car driven by an Ontario resident. The passengers, who were injured in the collision, submitted claims to State Farm Insurance, the driver’s insurer. Although the driver’s policy had been written in Ohio, State Farm was not an Ohio corporation. After State Farm denied their claims, the passengers submitted claims to their own insurance company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) (plaintiff), an Ohio corporation, for payment pursuant to their policy’s uninsured-motorist coverage. Nationwide paid the passengers’ claims and subsequently filed a subrogation lawsuit against both the driver and State Farm in Ohio state court. The lawsuit sought a declaration that Ohio law, and not Ontario law, applied to the matter. Application of Ohio law would require State Farm to indemnify the driver, as its insured, for all damages paid to the passengers. Application of Ontario’s no-fault law, on the other hand, would mean that the driver was not liable for the collision and that State Farm was therefore not required to indemnify her. The trial court concluded that Ontario law applied to the matter. Nationwide appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baird, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.