Native Village of Eyak v. Blank
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
688 F.3d 619 (2012)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
The Alaskan Native Village of Eyak (plaintiff) claimed that it possessed nonexclusive aboriginal hunting and fishing rights in the areas of the Outer Continental Shelf it traditionally used. The village sued, and the district court dismissed the case due to federal paramountcy. Under the paramountcy doctrine, the United States government had paramount interest in ocean waters and submerged lands below the low-water mark. The village appealed, arguing that even if the paramountcy doctrine applied, the village still had co-existent aboriginal rights.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.