From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Hodel
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
618 F.Supp. 848 (1985)
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (defendant) created the Cooperative Management Agreement (CMA) program, allowing ranchers to manage livestock grazing. The CMA program was established by a regulation (CMA regulation) that authorized the BLM to enter into special permit arrangements with ranchers who demonstrated “exemplary rangeland management practices,” a term not defined by the regulations. BLM officials had the discretion to determine which ranchers could participate in the CMA program. The CMA regulation (1) bound the BLM to the program terms for 10 years, (2) authorized permit evaluations no earlier than every five years, (3) allowed permit cancellation or modification only in limited circumstances, (4) automatically renewed permits if the agreement’s objectives were being met, and (5) gave permittees 10 years to comply with agreement objectives that were not being met. The Natural Resources Defense Council and others (plaintiffs) challenged the BLM’s CMA regulation on the basis that the regulation violated the duties of the secretary of the interior (secretary) (defendant) under the Taylor Grazing Act (Act), 43 U.S.C. §§ 315 et seq.; the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq.; and the Public Rangelands Improvement Management Act (PRIA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq. The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. The defendants also moved for summary judgment, arguing that the CMA regulation was valid because it required the specification of performance standards.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ramirez, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.