Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. EPA
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
822 F.2d 104 (1987)
- Written by Abby Keenan, JD
Facts
Under the Clean Water Act, the discharge of any pollutant into navigable waters was unlawful except as allowed under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit program. The Clean Water Act prescribed limitations on specific effluents based on the available pollution-control technology. These limitations were supplemented as needed to protect water quality in specific bodies of water. The Clean Water Act was structured to implement increasingly rigorous technology-based standards over time. The standards were enforced by requiring all dischargers to obtain a permit that set out limitations for specific effluents. In its final regulations issued in 1984, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) permanently prohibited bypasses, i.e., the diversion of waste streams from a treatment facility, subject to two exceptions: within effluent limits for essential maintenance, or in excess of effluent limitations only in an emergency. An industry group, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (the council) (plaintiff) challenged the prohibition as unauthorized under the Clean Water Act and inconsistent with the act’s policies. The council argued that (1) the prohibition acted as a de facto effluent limitation imposed without the necessary cost-benefit analysis, and (2) the prohibition was contrary to the legislative policy statement to encourage experimentation rather than dictate specific treatment processes.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Starr, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.