Nature Conservancy v. Congel

689 N.Y.S.2d 317 (1999)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nature Conservancy v. Congel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
689 N.Y.S.2d 317 (1999)

Facts

The Eisenbergs and the Danas (plaintiffs) own property adjacent to a rural area known as the Buffer Lands. The Buffer Lands were owned by Allied Corporation (Allied) as part of a quarry. The Buffer Lands separated the plaintiffs’ residential property from the active quarry operations. In 1986, Allied sold the quarry property to General Crushed Stone Company (Crushed Stone), which subsequently became Milestone Materials (Milestone) (defendant). The deed from Allied to Crushed Stone contained a restrictive covenant that required the Buffer Lands to be kept in their natural state. The restrictive covenant ran with the land and was binding on Crushed Stone and its successors. The covenant stated that it was for the benefit of adjacent property owners and was enforceable by the Nature Conservancy (plaintiff). In 1997, Congel (defendant) purchased part of the Buffer Lands from Milestone. The deed to Congel said that it was subject to all other matters of record. However, Congel intended to develop the property as a personal residence and erect a fence. The plaintiffs sued to enforce the restrictive covenant. The trial court held that the plaintiffs could not enforce the restrictive covenant because there was no privity between the plaintiffs and the original grantors of the covenant. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Callahan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership