Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
535 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008)


Facts

The Snowbowl ski area (Snowbowl) is located in the San Francisco Peaks in Arizona. The San Francisco Peaks (Peaks) are important to the Navajo Indian tribes (plaintiffs) in the region, because they are a site of religious practice. The Navajo believed that desecration of the Peaks could cause disasters to occur. In 2002, Snowbowl requested an upgrade to its facilities to allow for artificial snowmaking using recycled wastewater. Although the wastewater was deemed fit for human consumption, it contained .0001 percent human waste. The United States Forest Service (USFS) (defendant) ultimately approved Snowbowl’s request, but included provisions allowing the Navajo to continue to use the Peaks for religious ceremonies and requiring periodic inspection of the religious sites on the Peaks. In response, the Navajo sued, arguing that the use of the recycled wastewater desecrated the Peaks and had a negative effect on their religious practices. The district court held that USFS’s approval of Snowbowl’s proposal was not a substantial burden on the Navajo’s rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq., because the proposal did not coerce the Navajo into violating their religious beliefs or penalize their religious activity. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, and the case was taken en banc.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bea, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Fletcher, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.