Navios Corporation v. The Ulysses II
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
161 F. Supp. 932 (1958)

- Written by Deanna Curl, JD
Facts
Navios Corporation (plaintiff) entered into three charterparty agreements (the contracts) with the owners of The Ulysses II (the owners) (defendants) for time charters of three boats. Each of the contracts contained a clause that said the contract could be cancelled “If war is declared against any [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] countries…” In November 1956, hostilities erupted between Egypt, France, and the United Kingdom (the UK) over the nationalization of the Suez Canal by Egypt’s President Nassar. Between October 29 and November 5, Anglo-French planes bombed Egypt, diplomatic relations between Egypt and the UK and France were severed, and the United Nations General Assembly called an emergency session to call for a cease fire between the nations. On November 1, President Nassar gave a fiery speech in which he indicated that Egypt would fight and never surrender. President Nassar also took a number of other emergency measures, including closing the canal and declaring a state of emergency. On November 5, the owners notified Navios that they were invoking the war cancellation provisions of the contracts and cancelling them. Navios later filed suit against the owners in the district court, alleging that there must be a declaration of war to invoke the war cancellation provision and that the hostilities that were happening when the clause was invoked did not constitute war.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomsen, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.