Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

NBT Bank v. First National Community Bank

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
393 F.3d 404 (2004)


Facts

A check-kiting scheme carried out by various Pennsylvania businesses collapsed when a check deposited at NBT Bank, N.A. (NBT) (plaintiff) and presented for payment to First National Community Bank (FNCB) (defendant) was found to have been drawn on an FNCB account without sufficient funds. The events began when NBT sent the check to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Reserve Bank) to be presented to FNCB for payment. After providing NBT with provisional credit for the check from FNCB’s Reserve Bank account, the Reserve Bank presented the check to FNCB on March 12, 2001. The next day, after finding that the account lacked sufficient funds, FNCB took steps to return the check to NBT by delivering it to the Reserve Bank before midnight and sending a notice of dishonor to NBT, which was received by NBT the same day. When FNCB sent the check to the Reserve Bank, FNCB attached a strip of encoded magnetic ink to facilitate processing. However, FNCB had encoded the strip with the incorrect routing number, causing a three-day delay of return to NBT. NBT filed suit against FNCB, arguing that FNCB was liable to NBT for the full check amount due to FNCB’s encoding mistake. At trial, the parties stipulated that NBT did not suffer any actual damages or loss resulting from the error because NBT had received actual notice of dishonor from FNCB on March 13. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The district court granted FNCB’s motion and denied NBT’s motion. NBT appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rendell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.