From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Neal v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
Texas Court of Appeals, Fifth District
74 S.W.3d 468 (2002)
Tim and Laura Neal (plaintiffs) rented an apartment while Laura was pregnant. When the apartment became infested with ants, the Neals complained to the apartment complex’s management. The management had the apartment sprayed with the pesticide Dursban, manufactured by Dow Agrosciences LLC (Dow) (defendant). Laura gave birth to her baby, Tim Neal, Jr. Several months later, the baby died from a malignant brain tumor. The Neals sued Dow and others for, among other things, the wrongful death of their son. They alleged that exposure to Dursban caused Tim Neal Jr.’s brain tumor. At trial, Dr. John Midtling testified that exposure to Dursban more likely than not caused Tim Neal Jr.’s brain cancer. He based this conclusion in part on his review of four studies. According to Midtling, these studies linked exposure to pesticides with a risk of childhood brain cancer, and found a significant association between the risk of brain cancer and spraying for pesticides in the home. However, when the court reviewed these articles, it found that they did not conclude that the chemicals contained in Dursban caused childhood brain cancer. Instead, the articles found the data inconclusive and suggested further research. Dow filed for summary judgment. The trial court struck Midtling’s testimony from the record as inadmissible, and granted summary judgment in favor of Dow. The Neals appealed. On appeal, they argued that the trial judge abused his discretion by striking Midtling’s testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Whittington, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.