Neal v. Players Lake Charles

787 So. 2d 1213 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Neal v. Players Lake Charles

Louisiana Court of Appeal
787 So. 2d 1213 (2001)

Facts

Victoria and John Neal (plaintiffs) sued Players Lake Charles, LLC (Players) (defendant) to recover for injuries allegedly sustained by Victoria when she fell in a casino owned by Players. The Neals alleged that the casino floor was an unreasonably dangerous walking surface. During the litigation, the trial court took judicial notice about the qualities of the sealant that Players applied to the casino floor. Players applied the sealant every two weeks to keep the floor looking shiny and polished, but the trial court determined that the sealant had built up on the floor over time and caused the floor to become slick. The trial court suggested that Players should have stripped the floors regularly to prevent the sealant buildup. However, there was no evidence that the floor was slippery or that there were any foreign substances on the floor at the time of Victoria’s fall. After considering the evidence in the case, the trial court concluded that the floor was an unreasonably dangerous surface and awarded the Neals damages. Players appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, arguing, among other things, that the trial court improperly took judicial notice of the information about the sealant.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gremillion, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership