From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Nears v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
295 S.W.3d 787 (2010)
Sharon Nears (plaintiff) worked as the guest-services manager at the Mount Pleasant Holiday Inn (hotel) (defendant). The hotel was franchised by Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. (Holiday) (defendant). Nears alleged that Jack Marshall (defendant), the interim general manager at the hotel, had violent outbursts at work and created an environment of fear. The hotel later fired Nears, and she was not provided a reason for her termination. Nears filed a lawsuit against Marshall, the hotel, and Holiday. Nears alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress by Marshall. Nears claimed that Marshall acted as Holiday’s agent, and that Holiday was vicariously liable for Marshall’s tortious behavior. To support her vicarious-liability claim, Nears argued that Holiday controlled Marshall’s conduct as a general manager. Nears cited a manual that Holiday provided to all franchisees stating that all general managers were required to attend a conference hosted by Holiday each year. The evidence showed, however, that Marshall never attended the Holiday conferences. Nears also pointed to quarterly inspections conducted by Holiday at its franchisee hotels for further support of Holiday’s control over Marshall. Holiday introduced evidence that showed that Holiday did not have financial control over the hotel, that Holiday did not have the authority to hire or fire workers at the hotel, and that Holiday did not pay any compensation to employees at the hotel. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Holiday, and Nears appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Moseley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.