Negusie v. Holder

555 U.S. 511, 129 S. Ct. 1159, 173 L. Ed.2d 20 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Negusie v. Holder

United States Supreme Court
555 U.S. 511, 129 S. Ct. 1159, 173 L. Ed.2d 20 (2009)

Facts

At the age of 18, Daniel Girmai Negusie (plaintiff) left his home country of Ethiopia for Eritrea to see his mother and to find employment. A few months later, Eritrea officials took custody of Negusie and others when they were attending a movie, forced them to perform hard labor for a month, and then forced them to serve in the military. Thereafter, war broke out between Ethiopia and Eritrea. After Negusie refused to fight against his home country he was incarcerated in an Eritrea prison. Prison guards beat Negusie with sticks and placed him in the hot sun for hours at a time. Negusie was released two years later and forced to work as a prison guard. In that role, Negusie carried a gun, guarded the gate to prevent prisoner escape, and witnessed at least one prisoner die from prolonged exposure to the sun. Negusie eventually escaped from Eritrea by hiding in a container loaded on a ship and bound for the United States. Upon entering the United States, Negusie requested asylum. The immigration judge denied Negusie’s request and held that he had assisted in the persecution of others while serving as a prison guard in Eritrea. Negusie argued that he had been forced to work as a prison guard and did so under duress. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the immigration judge’s order. Negusie appealed the BIA’s decision by filing a petition against Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., in the court of appeals. The appellate court affirmed the judgment of the BIA. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership