Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Nelson-Salabes, Inc. v. Morningside Holdings

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
2001 WL 419002 (2001)


Facts

Nelson-Salabes, Incorporated (Nelson) (plaintiff) was hired to design a proposed assisted-living facility in Baltimore County called Satyr Hill. Nelson’s architectural drawings were submitted, as required by the county, with the development plans. The plan was approved. Nelson’s design for the Satyr Hill site included a three-story, Y-shaped building and several distinctive features on the front, including an octagonal silo at the entrance, bay windows, and vertical protrusions with gable roofs midway down each side of the building to create visual interest. The process of obtaining approval was long, and Satyr Hill’s site approval was therefore a significant benefit to Morningside Holdings (Morningside) (defendant) when it purchased the site from the initial developers. After purchasing the site, Morningside told Nelson it would not continue as architects on the project. Nelson informed Morningside that the existing architectural drawings could not be used for the site if a new architectural firm was retained. However, to avoid having to obtain an entirely new approval for the plans, Morningside directed the new architects to make only minor revisions and changes to the structure and outer appearance. Like the Nelson plans, the new plans featured a Y-shaped building, an octagonal silo at the entrance, brick siding on the first floor, and vertical protrusions with gable roofs. Nelson brought a claim against Morningside for copyright infringement.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.