Nelson v. Erickson

190 Wash. App. 1003 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nelson v. Erickson

Washington Court of Appeals
190 Wash. App. 1003 (2015)

Facts

Michael Erickson (defendant) rear-ended a car driven by Jess Nelson (plaintiff), which injured Nelson’s back. Nelson sued Erickson for negligence. Prior to trial, the parties stipulated that Erickson had been injured in the accident and that, in the eight months immediately following the accident, Nelson had incurred $9,361 in medical expenses. However, Erickson denied that Nelson was entitled to damages for past or future pain and suffering or for future medical damages. The trial occurred three years after the accident. At trial, Nelson’s medical expert testified that Nelson had degenerative disk disease that had been aggravated by the accident; that Nelson still experienced neck and back pain from the accident; and that if the pain continued, Nelson would need cervical epidural injections to alleviate the pain. Nelson, his family members, and his friends testified that continuing pain from the accident had caused him to limit his activities. Erickson’s expert testified that Nelson had suffered a soft-tissue injury that should have resolved itself within weeks to months and that Nelson should not be in ongoing pain. In closing arguments, Erickson’s attorney conceded that Nelson’s pain was ongoing but argued that there was no evidence that the accident had caused pain lasting more than six to eight months. The jury awarded Nelson past noneconomic damages as well as past and future medical expenses, but it did not award damages for future pain and suffering. The trial court granted Nelson’s motion for additur, increasing the jury’s award for future pain and suffering from $0 to $3,000. Erickson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lau, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership