Nelson v. Freeland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
507 S.E.2d 882 (1998)
Dean Freeland (defendant) requested that friend and co-worker John Harvey Nelson (plaintiff) pick him up at his house for a business meeting the two had that day. As Nelson walked to the front door of Freeland’s resident he tripped over a stick that Freeland had inadvertently left lying on his porch, fell down, and sustained injuries. Nelson filed a negligence suit against Freeland and his wife seeking damages for the injuries he sustained in the fall. The trial court granted the Freelands’ motion for summary judgment. Nelson appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. The Supreme Court of North Carolina granted certiorari to review the status of negligence law in the state.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wynn, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.