Nelson v. Hotchkiss
Missouri Supreme Court
601 S.W.2d 14 (1980)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Irma Nelson (plaintiff) and Dorothy Hotchkiss (defendant) were sisters. In 1969, under unclear circumstances and with no indication as to the parties’ intentions, a farm was deeded to “Robert Nelson and Irma Nelson, husband and wife; and Herbert Hotchkiss and Dorothy Hotchkiss, husband and wife, as joint tenants with right of survivorship in all four, and not as tenants in common.” Robert and Irma divorced in 1975. In 1976, Robert sold his interest in the farm to Herbert and Dorothy. After Herbert died in 1977, Irma petitioned to sell the farm and divide the proceeds with Dorothy according to their respective interests in the property. The trial court ruled that the effect of Robert’s 1976 conveyance was to terminate the joint tenancy in what had been Robert’s one-fourth interest in the property, with the other three-fourths remaining as the jointly held property of the remaining grantees. Accordingly, the court ruled that in the wake of Herbert’s death, Dorothy was entitled to five-eighths of the farm’s sale proceeds and Irma to three-eighths. Dorothy appealed. The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed, increasing Dorothy’s share of the sale proceeds to three-fourths and reducing Irma’s share to one-fourth. The Missouri Supreme Court then took jurisdiction due to the case’s public significance.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Welliver, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.