Nelson v. Streeter

16 F.3d 145 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nelson v. Streeter

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
16 F.3d 145 (1994)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In 1987 Harold Washington, the first Black mayor of Chicago, died. Washington was widely beloved in the city. The next year, David Nelson (plaintiff), a student at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago (the school), a private institution, painted a portrait of Washington wearing women’s underwear in reference to a rumor about what Washington had been wearing at the time of his death. Nelson’s painting was included in an exhibit of student work that was not open to the public. Despite this, the painting became the focus of public outrage. A group of Chicago aldermen (defendants) demanded that the school remove the painting and threatened to withhold city funds if the school refused to apologize for exhibiting the painting. One day, two aldermen went to the school to remove the painting. One of the aldermen took the painting from the wall while the other alderman brandished a gun. The aldermen were stopped from taking the painting out of the school. Additional aldermen arrived, took the painting to the president’s office, and demanded that it be taken into police custody. The police eventually returned the painting to Nelson. The school apologized to the city for exhibiting the painting and refused to display it again. Nelson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the aldermen in federal district court, alleging that the aldermen violated his First Amendment rights by entering the school, a private institution, without an invitation and removing the painting. The aldermen asserted that they were entitled to a defense of qualified immunity. The district court rejected the aldermen’s defense. The aldermen appealed and further argued that they were acting as private citizens in removing the painting, and that they removed the painting to prevent a riot by the public.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership