Netherlands Arbitration Institute Case No. 2319

Case No. 2319, CISG-online 740 (2002)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Netherlands Arbitration Institute Case No. 2319

Netherlands Arbitration Institute
Case No. 2319, CISG-online 740 (2002)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Several companies (collectively, the seller) (defendant) conducted exploratory activities in the gas fields of the Netherlands. The exploration of gas fields generated a liquid product, or condensate. The seller’s condensate was known as Rijn Blend. Rijn Blend, like other condensates, had varying chemical compositions. There was no industry standard for mercury levels in condensate. Rijn Blend could be used for different refining processes. Prior to 1993, a major international oil refinery (the buyer) (plaintiff) contracted to purchase Rijn Blend from the seller. For the first two years, there were no issues relating to levels of mercury in the Rijn Blend. In June 1998, the buyer refused delivery of the product. The buyer normally resold the Rijn Blend, but unexpectedly higher levels of mercury in the condensate had made it unacceptable for further processing or sales. To cover the buyer’s refusal to take delivery, the seller agreed to sell the Rijn Blend to several third parties (cover transactions). The cover transactions were for a substantially reduced price, or about $6.3 million less than the contract price. The seller initiated an arbitration against the buyer, arguing that their contract did not call for any specific quality requirements. The buyer argued that the Rijn Blend was nonconforming under the relevant standard of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership