Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

New Century Financial Services, Inc. v. Dennegar

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
928 A.2d 48 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007)


New Century Financial Services, Inc. (plaintiff), a debt collector, brought an action against Lee Dennegar (defendant) to recover a balance of $14,752.93 owed on a credit card issued in Dennegar’s name by AT&T Universal. AT&T issued the credit card in February of 2001. Dennegar alleged that he did not know about the credit-card account. Dennegar said that between 1999 and 2003 he lived with Mark Knutson and had allowed Knutson to manage the household’s finances. Dennegar let Knutson open Dennegar’s mail, handle the household’s bills, and write checks on Dennegar’s checking account for Dennegar’s signature. Dennegar also let Knutson sign Dennegar’s name to checks. Dennegar admitted that some of the charges on the AT&T credit card were for purchases that Dennegar would typically let Knutson make for the household. Periodic payments were made toward the credit-card balance in 2002. However, when Knutson died in 2003, the account was in default. Dennegar tried to avoid liability for the credit-card debt, asserting that he only learned after Knutson’s death that Knutson had incurred the obligations in Dennegar’s name. Dennegar also asserted that holding him responsible for the balance due on the account would be improper under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). The trial court found that Dennegar had a poor memory and may have entered the credit relationship with AT&T himself. But the court further found that even if Dennegar had not personally opened the AT&T account, Dennegar had authorized Knutson to manage the household’s financial affairs, which included opening the AT&T account and using the AT&T credit card. The trial court entered judgment in New Century’s favor for the full amount of the debt, and Dennegar appealed to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 499,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 499,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial