Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

New Energy Economy Inc. v. Martinez

Supreme Court of New Mexico
247 P.3d 286 (N.M. 2011)


Facts

The New Mexico State Records Center and Archives (Records Center), under the supervision of the State Records Administrator, was tasked with receiving regulations from issuing agencies and publishing them in a timely manner in the New Mexico Register. Under the Records Center’s own regulations, regulations filed with the Records Center after the cut-off date for publication must be published in the following issue. According to the Records Center’s schedule, regulations submitted between December 16, 2010 and January 4, 2011, were to be published on January 14, 2011. On December 27, 2010, the Environmental Improvement Board (EIB) filed an environmental regulation. The Records Center scheduled the regulation for publication on January 14, 2011. On December 23, 2010, the Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) filed a set of environmental regulations. The Records Center also scheduled these regulations to be published on January 14, 2011. On January 1, 2011, the newly-elected Governor of New Mexico issued an executive order suspending all proposed and pending rules and regulations for a ninety-day period. Based on this executive order, the Acting Secretary of the New Mexico Environment Department (Environment Department) requested that the Records Center suspend publication of the environmental regulations filed by the EIB and the WQCC. Neither the EIB nor the WQCC were under the authority of the Secretary of the Environment Department. The Records Center suspended publication of the environmental regulations. Thereafter, New Energy Economy Inc. (New Energy) (plaintiff) petitioned for a writ of mandamus against the Governor, the Secretary of the Environment Department, and the State Records Administrator (defendants). New Energy sought publication of the regulations and an order directing the Governor and Secretary to rescind the cancellation of the filings and to refrain from interfering with the publication process.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Chavez, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.