New Mexico ex rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land Management
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
565 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 2009)
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (defendant) sought to amend the resource-management plan (RMP) for the Otero Mesa after natural gas was discovered there. The region traditionally had not been significantly developed by oil and gas companies. Amending the RMP required an environmental-impact assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). BLM issued a draft environmental-impact statement (EIS) analyzing potential methods of managing the land. The draft EIS limited surface disturbances to areas within 492 feet of existing roads. BLM’s final EIS modified the draft by changing the 492-feet limitation to a limitation of 5 percent of the total land area at any given time, with no restriction as to location. BLM determined that its modified EIS required no additional environmental analysis, because substantially the same amount of surface area would be ripe for development. BLM executed an oil and gas lease on the land prior to analyzing the impact of development on each leasing site. The State of New Mexico and various environmental groups (plaintiffs) brought suit against BLM, arguing that BLM was required to issue a supplemental environmental assessment and that BLM was required to conduct a site-specific analysis of each leasing site prior to beginning the leasing process. The district court determined that BLM had complied with NEPA’s EIS requirement but had failed to comply with NEPA’s requirement to conduct site-specific analyses prior to the leasing process. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lucero, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.