New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira
United States Supreme Court
139 S. Ct. 532 (2019)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Dominic Oliveira (plaintiff) worked as a truck driver for New Prime Inc. (defendant). Oliveira, whose contract with New Prime classified him as an independent contractor, participated in a federal class action, alleging that New Prime underpaid its drivers and that it misclassified them as independent contractors instead of as employees. Oliveira’s contract with New Prime included an arbitration clause, which provided that any disputes between the parties arising from the contract, including disagreements concerning whether arbitration was required, would be arbitrated. New Prime requested that the district court use its authority under the Federal Arbitration Act (act) to compel arbitration of the issues raised in the class action. The district court declined to compel arbitration, citing an exception to the act for contracts of employment for workers engaged in interstate commerce. The court reasoned that Oliveira, as a truck driver, was a worker engaged in interstate commerce and that his contract with New Prime was a contract of employment, leaving the court with no authority under the act to compel arbitration. New Prime appealed, arguing that the phrase “contracts of employment” includes contracts between employers and employees but does not include contracts between employers and independent contractors. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gorsuch, J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.