New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
United States Supreme Court
440 U.S. 568 (1979)
The New York City Transit Authority (defendant) promulgated a policy that it would not hire or employ persons currently participating in one of New York City’s several methadone maintenance programs. About 40,000 persons received methadone treatments in New York, and treatments were primarily administered to treat the physical withdrawal symptoms of heroin addicts. Beazer (plaintiff) and three other persons brought suit in federal district court against the New York City Transit Authority in a class action on behalf of all persons who had been, or would in the future be, subject to discharge or rejection as employees of the Transit Authority because they participated in a methadone maintenance program. The district court ruled in favor of Beazer and found the employment policy unconstitutional. The decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.