New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union of America

35 A.D.3d 73, 822 N.Y.S.2d 579 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union of America

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
35 A.D.3d 73, 822 N.Y.S.2d 579 (2006)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Local 100 of the Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO (Local 100) (defendant) represented hourly workers of the New York City Transit Authority and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (transit authorities) (plaintiffs). The parties’ collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) expired in mid-December 2005. Local 100 members planned to strike if a new CBA was not in place by December 16. On December 12, the transit authorities sued under New York’s Taylor Law to enjoin Local 100 from striking. The court enjoined the strike, but Local 100 went on strike anyway on December 20, effectively shutting down the city’s transit systems. The transit authorities moved to hold Local 100 in criminal contempt, seeking a $1 million fine for violating the injunction that would double each day the strike continued. Local 100 argued that it had a Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial on the contempt issue and that the proposed fines were excessive, among other things. The transit authorities countered by explaining the disruption and cost caused by transit strikes. The transit authorities also showed that Local 100 had millions of dollars in assets. The court denied Local 100’s request for a jury trial, found Local 100 in contempt, and fined it $1 million for each day it remained on strike, for a total of $2.5 million. Local 100 appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership