New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres

552 U.S. 196 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres

United States Supreme Court
552 U.S. 196 (2008)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Justices on the New York Supreme Court (NYSC) were elected in each of the state’s 12 judicial districts. Before 1921, NYSC candidates were nominated by a direct primary. After 1921, the state required political parties to nominate candidates at a convention held by delegates in each judicial district. The delegates were elected in 150 assembly districts by submitting a petition with 500 party member signatures or five percent of the party’s enrollment. Lopez Torres (plaintiff) was the Democratic Party’s nominee to the civil court for Kings County. After winning the election in 1992, party leaders demanded that Lopez Torres make patronage hires, which she refused. The party’s leadership opposed Lopez Torres at the nominating conventions for the NYSC in 1997, 2002, and 2003. Lopez Torres sued the New York State Board of Elections (NYSBE) (defendant), seeking a declaration that New York’s convention system violated her First Amendment rights and a preliminary injunction returning the direct primary election for nominees to the NYSC. The District Court granted the injunction and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership