Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
159 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 1998)


Facts

On April 25, 1988, New York State National Organization for Women (NOW) (plaintiff) filed a motion seeking an injunction to prevent Terry (defendant) and several antiabortion organizations from blocking access to medical facilities that provided abortions and from harassing medical staff and patients during protests planned for the following week. The court granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) on April 28 and again on May 2, prohibiting Terry and the other defendants from demonstrating in front of the facilities. The defendants violated both orders, and the case was removed to federal court, where the district judge issued another TRO. The TRO included coercive fines of $25,000 for each day that the defendants violated the order. Despite the existence of TRO, the defendants again protested in front of medical facilities. In the face of the defendants plans to protest yet again, the court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from obstructing the entrance to the facilities and from harassing the staff and patients. When the defendants violated the injunction, the court imposed the coercive fines. The defendants appealed, triggering several other appeals in this case on the issue of fines. On remand, the trial court modified the injunction to include a purge clause, finding that if the defendants did not comply with the conditions in the order that they would be liable for the fines. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Leval, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.