New York Times Company v. City of New York Fire Department

4 N.Y.3d 477, 796 N.Y.S.2d 302, 829 N.E.2d 266 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

New York Times Company v. City of New York Fire Department

New York Court of Appeals
4 N.Y.3d 477, 796 N.Y.S.2d 302, 829 N.E.2d 266 (2005)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Following a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, the City of New York Fire Department (defendant) created or maintained three types of records: (1) calls made to the fire department’s 911 service line; (2) calls made between fire-department personnel on an internal communications system; and (3) “oral histories,” consisting of interviews with firefighters soon after the terrorist attack. Many people in the World Trade Center died on September 11, while some survived. Pursuant to state law, the New York Times Company and its reporter Jim Dwyer (collectively, the Times) (plaintiffs) requested copies of the fire department’s records related to September 11. The fire department mostly denied the request. The Times sued the fire department, and the trial court ordered many disclosures, including some portions of the 911 calls, but not all the oral histories. The appellate division affirmed in large part. The Times appealed. A few families had no objection to the disclosure of 911 calls in which the voices of their loved ones could be heard.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

Dissent (Rosenblatt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership