New York v. Jackson

967 N.E.2d 1160, 18 N.Y.3d 738, 944 N.Y.S.2d 715 (2012)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

New York v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals
967 N.E.2d 1160, 18 N.Y.3d 738, 944 N.Y.S.2d 715 (2012)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

Samuel Jackson (defendant) was pulled over for a routine traffic violation. When the police officer approached Jackson’s car, the officer smelled marijuana and saw Jackson in the driver’s seat holding a bag of marijuana. A subsequent search of Jackson’s car found several other bags of marijuana. Jackson was charged with various crimes, including fifth-degree possession of marijuana (public possession), which prohibits possession of marijuana in a public place when the marijuana is either burning or in public view. Jackson pleaded guilty to public possession to resolve all of the charges but subsequently challenged the original public-possession charge. Jackson argued that his car was not a public place and that, even if it were, the state failed to sufficiently allege that the marijuana in Jackson’s hand was in public view. Jackson’s arguments were rejected, and Jackson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Graffeo, J.)

Dissent (Lippman, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership