Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

New York v. Kaplan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
556 N.E.2d 415 (1990)


Facts

Murray Kaplan (defendant) was involved in a cocaine ring led by Kaplan’s cousin, Mike. During a police investigation into the operation, Detective Janis Grasso posed as a drug courier and arranged to purchase cocaine from Mike. When Grasso arrived at Mike’s office, Mike told Kaplan, who was present at the office, to “take care of” Grasso. Kaplan then retrieved a manila envelope from a file cabinet and placed it in front of Grasso. In exchange, Grasso handed Kaplan $15,000 in cash. Kaplan took the money and immediately began to count it. Kaplan was subsequently charged as an accomplice to criminal sale of a narcotic. At trial, the defense requested the court to charge the jury that, to find Kaplan guilty as an accomplice, the jury must find that Kaplan had both specific intent to sell a narcotic and a shared intent or purpose with the principal actors. The court denied counsel’s request, noting that the mens rea required for criminal sale was not the specific intent to make a sale, but the knowledge that the substance sold was a narcotic. The court then instructed the jury that to be found guilty as an accomplice, Kaplan must have acted with knowledge that he was selling cocaine and must have intentionally aided in the sale of the cocaine. Kaplan was convicted. The appellate division affirmed. The court of appeals granted Kaplan leave to appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Titone, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.