United States Supreme Court
467 U.S. 649 (1984)
A woman approached two officers and told them she had just been raped. She provided the police with a detailed description of her attacker, said that he had just entered a supermarket nearby, and that he was carrying a gun. The police arrived at the supermarket and saw Quarles (defendant) inside. Quarles fit the description of the assailant and when he saw the police, he ran to the back of the store. The police gave chase and kept him in sight for all but a few seconds, until he was caught. One officer frisked him and found an empty gun holster. After handcuffing him, the officer asked Quarles where the gun was and Quarles gestured with his head saying “the gun is over there.” The officer found the gun and read Quarles his Miranda warnings. The officers then asked Quarles about his ownership of the gun and where he got it. Quarles answered these questions. The trial court held that the statement “the gun is over there,” must be excluded because it was elicited before the police read Quarles his Miranda warnings. Furthermore, the court held that his answers to the subsequent questions had to be excluded as evidence tainted by the Miranda violation. The court of appeals affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.