Newberger v. State

641 So. 2d 419 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Newberger v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
641 So. 2d 419 (1994)

Facts

Mitchell Newberger (defendant) worked as an accounts credit analyst. In this role, Newberger would help customers apply for new credit cards by gathering their information and entering it into a computer. The computer would then automatically transmit the customer’s information to a credit bureau for approval or denial of the credit application. The computer program contained an option that allowed the analyst to bypass the automatic transmission of the information by pressing a number key. Newberger used this option to illegally open two fraudulent credit card accounts for himself, which he used to defraud his employer. Newberger was charged and convicted of making a false statement to obtain a credit card and of illegally modifying intellectual property by a computer. Newberger appealed, alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support either charge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ryder, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership