Newman v. Commissioner

T.C. Memo 2016–125 (2016)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Newman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2016–125 (2016)

Facts

In July 2008, Keith Newman (plaintiff) opened a checking account at Bank of America and deposited a total of $8,625 into the account. Of that amount, $8,500 came from a single check drawn on another account Newman held at Wells Fargo. Shortly after, Newman withdrew $8,000 in cash from Bank of America. However, the $8,500 check did not clear and was later returned to Wells Fargo. This resulted in the Bank of America account becoming overdrawn. Newman never repaid the overdraft, and Bank of America closed his account in August 2008. In December 2011, Bank of America issued Newman a Form 1099-C, reporting $7,875 in cancellation of debt income for that year. Newman did not report this amount as income on his 2011 federal income tax return. At that time, Newman had $35,000 in assets and $50,000 in liabilities. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed a deficiency. Newman petitioned the tax court for a redetermination, arguing that he did not have cancellation of debt income and that, even if he did, it was excludable from his gross income under § 108(a)(1)(B)’s insolvency exception.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vasquez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership