Newman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Supreme Court of California
926 P.2d 969 (1996)
Helen Lathrop executed a will in 1972, which placed her estate in a trust, with the income to be distributed to her siblings, or, if a sibling died, to that sibling’s living issue. Upon the death of the last sibling the trust was to be distributed to her siblings’ then-living children. Lathrop died in 1972 and her estate was distributed to Wells Fargo Bank (the bank) as trustee. Lathrop’s brother, Earl Mitchell, died in 1993. Mitchell had a biological son, Jon Newman, who was adopted out of the family in 1946. The bank (plaintiff) petitioned the court for a determination as to whether Newman was the “issue of” Mitchell at the time of Mitchell’s death.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)
Dissent (Kennard, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 159,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.