Nicini v. Morra
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
212 F.3d 798 (2000)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Anthony Nicini, Jr. (plaintiff) was a teenager who attempted suicide due to an abusive home life. The Department of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) (defendant) assigned caseworker Frank Cyrus (defendant) to the case. After another suicide attempt by Nicini, Cyrus removed Nicini from his parents’ custody and placed him in foster care. He twice ran away from his foster families. Nicini was hospitalized and fled the hospital after he learned he may be committed to the psychiatric unit for his depression. Nicini sought refuge at the home of family friends, the Morras (defendants). Cyrus ultimately agreed to let Nicini be temporarily placed with the Morras despite the family not being an official foster home. Cyrus twice visited the home, conducted background checks, and interviewed the Morras. Ultimately, based on Cyrus’s recommendation that the family could serve as a para-foster home, a family-court judge ordered that Nicini remain with the Morras. However, a few weeks later, Nicini fled the home and alleged that the Morras had been providing him with drugs and that the father was sexually abusing him. It was later revealed that the father had a criminal history of corrupting minors. Nicini filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that being subjected to sexual abuse while in DYFS custody violated his constitutional right to physical safety. Cyrus argued that there was not a violation because he could not have known about the abuse. The district court granted summary judgment and found that Cyrus’s actions did not amount to a violation of Nicini’s rights. Nicini appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sloviter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.