From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...
Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
270 F.3d 590 (8th Cir. 2001)
Nick (plaintiff) filed a sexual harassment suit against Morgan’s Foods, Inc. (Morgan’s) (defendant). The parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) with a court appointed mediator. The district court issued an order referring the case to ADR (Referral Order). The Referral Order mandated that each party draft a memorandum outlining the facts and the party’s arguments and submit the memo to the mediator at least seven days before the first mediation conference. The Referral Order also mandated that each party participated in the mediation in good faith and that noncompliance with any court deadline could result in sanctions. Morgan’s failed to file its memorandum seven days in advance of the first conference. In addition, at the conference, Morgan’s’ in house counsel—who made all its business decisions—was not present. Although he was reachable by phone, no settlement offer over $500 could be accepted without his approval. Nick made two offers at the mediation, but both were rejected without a counteroffer. After the conference, at a show cause hearing on Morgan’s’ conduct, it was established that Morgan’s felt that the Referral Order was non-binding and chose not to follow it. The district court found that Morgan’s did not participate in the mediation in good faith. The court sanctioned and fined Morgan’s, ordering it to pay Nick and her attorneys’ fees for the mediation, as well as a fine to be paid to the clerk for failing to file the pre-conference memorandum on time. Morgan’s filed a motion for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion and also imposed additional sanctions and fines against Morgan’s for filing a frivolous motion. Morgan’s appealed only the fees to be paid to the clerk, arguing that Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does not authorize fines payable to the court and that Morgan’s did not know about the actions of its counsel.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McMillian, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.