Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.

384 F. Supp. 3d 254 (2019)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
384 F. Supp. 3d 254 (2019)

Facts

Dean Nicosia (plaintiff) purchased a weight-loss supplement called 1 Day Diet using an Amazon.com (defendant) account belonging to his wife, Annemarie Nicosia. Although Dean and Annemarie both used the account, it was opened by and belonged to Annemarie. The account was initially free under the Amazon Mom program, which allowed new mothers to enjoy discounted baby products and the benefits of Amazon Prime. The Amazon Mom signup page contained prominently displayed text telling the individual signing up that after the free period was over, she would be charged $79 for Amazon Prime and Amazon Mom benefits. Another prominent notice immediately above the “Continue” button notified the person that by agreeing to continue, the person agreed with the “Amazon Mom Terms and Conditions,” with a hyperlink provided to the terms and conditions. To complete the registration process, the person was taken to a page to input payment information. That page prominently displayed another notice saying that by signing up, the person acknowledged that she had read and agreed with the “Amazon Prime Terms and Conditions” (T&C), with a hyperlink provided to them. The T&C contained a provision indicating that the T&C constituted the entire agreement between the user and Amazon.com, subject to any future changes. At the time the account was opened, Amazon’s conditions of use did not contain an arbitration provision. However, on August 19, 2011, an arbitration clause was added to the T&C requiring any claims related to the use of Amazon.com to be resolved in binding arbitration. In November 2013, the Food and Drug Administration announced that an ingredient in 1 Day Diet was unsafe. Dean brought a class action against Amazon.com. Amazon.com moved to compel arbitration, and the matter was referred to a district-court judge for a report and recommendation. The judge recommended that the motion be granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glasser, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership