Niederstadt v. Town of Carrizozo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
182 P.3d 769 (2008)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Charles Niederstadt (plaintiff) alleged that as he sat on his mother’s porch, Officer Rivera arrested Niederstadt by grabbing his hair, slamming him into the ground, and twisting his arm behind his back. Niederstadt sued for civil-rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and for assault, battery, false arrest, and false imprisonment under the New Mexico Tort Claims Act (the tort act). In the federal lawsuit, Rivera was the only named defendant; the Town of Carrizozo (the town) (defendant) was not a federal defendant. Rivera brought the federal complaint to his superior officer, and town leadership decided not to defend Rivera in the federal lawsuit. Niederstadt and Rivera settled the federal suit; Niederstadt was awarded a judgment of $60,000, and Rivera assigned his potential claims against the town to Niederstadt. Niederstadt, acting as Rivera’s assignee, sued the town in state court, seeking a declaratory judgment that the town was bound to defend and indemnify Rivera and seeking damages for the town’s alleged bad-faith failure to defend Rivera. The state district court dismissed Niederstadt’s state lawsuit because the town was not appropriately notified of the federal suit under the tort act. Niederstadt appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.