Nielson v. Myers

90 P.3d 628, 193 Or. App. 388 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nielson v. Myers

Oregon Court of Appeals
90 P.3d 628, 193 Or. App. 388 (2004)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

The Northwest Family Reunion (the club) was a gifting club that operated in Oregon. Members of the club participated by paying $2,000 in order to be placed on a board. If the members recruited other participants, they would move up the board. If a member was able to move to the top of the board, he could earn over $13,000. The Oregon attorney general (defendant) issued a press release stating that the club was an illegal pyramid scheme in violation of the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act, which was the state unfair or deceptive acts or practices statute. The press release also warned members of the club that they would be fined if they attempted to recruit new participants. A group of members (the plaintiff members) (plaintiffs) filed a declaratory-judgment lawsuit in Oregon state court, seeking a declaration that the club was lawful and an injunction stopping the attorney general from interfering with the club. The plaintiff members argued that the club was not an illegal pyramid scheme because anyone could discuss or encourage participation in the club, and because there was no deception required to recruit participants. The plaintiff members and the attorney general filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment for the attorney general, holding that the club was an illegal pyramid scheme under Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act. The plaintiff members moved for a new trial, which the trial court denied. The plaintiff members appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Linder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership