Nixon v. Lichtenstein

959 S.W.2d 854 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nixon v. Lichtenstein

Missouri Court of Appeals
959 S.W.2d 854 (1997)

SC

Facts

Allene Lichtenstein (defendant) was a director of the David B. Lichtenstein Foundation (the foundation). The foundation was created by an indenture of trust. The trust prohibited self-dealing and capped its directors’ compensation at 5 percent of the trust’s income. In 1991, in accordance with the trust indenture, the foundation was dissolved, and its assets were used to start the Lichtenstein Foundation (the corporation), a nonprofit corporation. The corporation’s articles of incorporation maintained the terms of the trust, including the prohibition on self-dealing and the cap on directors’ compensation. In 1993, Lichtenstein was appointed as first vice president/director and received a salary of $120,000. Lichtenstein also used corporation funds to install a telephone line in every room in her house. There was also evidence that Lichtenstein used corporation funds for personal travel. The attorney general (plaintiff) sued Lichtenstein for breaching her duties to the corporation. The trial court applied trust law to the case and removed Lichtenstein as a director. The trial court found under trust law that Lichtenstein violated the articles of incorporation and ordered Lichtenstein to reimburse the corporation. Lichtenstein appealed, arguing that the court should not have applied trust law but rather corporations law, and specifically the business-judgment rule. Lichtenstein argued that because the foundation was converted into a corporation, she was a corporate director and no longer a trustee.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hoff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership