Nohe v. Roblyn Development Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
686 A.2d 382 (1997)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Nohes (plaintiffs) contracted to buy residential property and the construction of a house from Roblyn Development Corp. (Roblyn) (defendants) for $651,488.70. The Nohes paid a deposit of $79,027.40. A dispute arose and the Nohes backed out of the deal. Subsequently, Roblyn sold the house to a third party for $840,000. The Nohes brought suit on the contract, seeking to have the deposit returned. The Nohes filed a motion for summary judgment and conceded for purposes of the motion that they breached the contract. The trial court granted the Nohes’ motion and ordered the deposit returned. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Coburn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.