Norris v. King

355 So. 2d 21 (1978)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Norris v. King

Louisiana Court of Appeal
355 So. 2d 21 (1978)

Facts

Michael Norris (plaintiff) was arrested for the theft of money from a Coke machine in a business owned by Brian King (defendant). Norris was arrested and charged, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a fine of $100 and probation. Subsequently, King posted a paper in his business that showed a photograph of Norris and Norris’s name and address and explained what Norris had done and his charge and sentencing. It also stated that anyone else who stole would be caught on the security camera and prosecuted. In addition to the notice, King harassed Norris and his family by repeatedly telephoning them and making threats. Norris sued King for invasion of his right to privacy related to the posting in King’s business. At trial, King claimed that his motivation was to warn of future thieves, not to coerce Norris. The trial court found in favor of Norris and awarded him a judgment of $500 on the grounds that King had misused Norris’s name and address in an overzealous attempt to coerce Norris into paying restitution for the stolen money. King appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Foret, J.)

Dissent (Hood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership